The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6714•United States of America v. Michael Earl Crews
07-6714Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 26, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6714
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL EARL CREWS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
District Judge. (5:00-cr-00087-2H)
Submitted: May 29, 2008 Decided: June 26, 2008
Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Earl Crews, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
PER CURIAM:
Michael Earl Crews appeals the district court’s orders
denying his “Renewed Motion to Waive Fine” and his motion to
reconsider that denial. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Crews, No. 5:00-cr-00087-2H
(E.D.N.C. Sept. 20, 2006 & Dec. 8, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.