The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6706•Terry L. Bramwell v. RAYMOND IGLECIA, Doctor
07-6706Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 7, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6706
TERRY L. BRAMWELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RAYMOND IGLECIA, Doctor,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
JOHNNY NEWHART, Sheriff,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:05-cv-00475)
Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 7, 2007
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terry L. Bramwell, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Joseph Terrell,
WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Terry L. Bramwell appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bramwell v.
Iglecia, No. 3:05-cv-00475 (E.D. Va. Mar. 22, 2007). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.