The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6682•Thomas M. Tully v. NICOLE M. SPICER, Frederick County Virginia Commonwealth Attorney
07-6682Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 30, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6682
THOMAS M. TULLY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NICOLE M. SPICER, Frederick County Virginia
Commonwealth Attorney; MELISSA RICE, Director
of Victim Witness Program; FRED D. HILDEBRAND,
Supervisor of Northwestern Regional Adult
Detention Center; GENE BOYCE, Telephone
overseer at Northwestern Regional Adult
Detention Center; LISA HOSKINS, Convicted liar
in Virginia Court System,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (7:07-cv-00188-SGW)
Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 30, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas M. Tully, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Thomas M. Tully appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tully
v. Spicer, No. 7:07-cv-00188-SGW (W.D. Va. Apr. 19, 2007). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.