The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6659•Thomas M. Tully v. NAOMI LONG, Magistrate, Frederick County, VA
07-6659Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 29, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6659
THOMAS M. TULLY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NAOMI LONG, Magistrate, Frederick County, VA;
MARTHA BAKER, Magistrate, Frederick County,
VA; JOHN J. MCGRATH, JR., Judge,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (7:07-cv-00165-sgw)
Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 29, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas M. Tully, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Thomas M. Tully appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for mandamus construed in part as a 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2000) complaint and dismissing the action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant Tully’s motion to amend his informal brief, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tully v.
Long, No. 7:07-cv-00165-sgw (W.D. Va. signed as entered on Apr. 11
& filed on Apr. 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.