The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6608•Disamodha C. Amarasinghe; Narlie Amarasinghe v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
07-6608Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 28, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1226
DISAMODHA C. AMARASINGHE; NARLIE AMARASINGHE,
Petitioners - Appellants,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent - Appellee.
On Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 06-15883)
Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: June 23, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Disamodha C. Amarasinghe, Narlie Amarasinghe, Appellants Pro Se.
Donald L. Korb, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Washington, D.C.; Teresa
Ellen McLaughlin, Patrick J. Urda, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Disamodha C. Amarasinghe and Narlie Amarasinghe appeal
from the tax court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s
determination of a deficiency in the Amarasinghes’ income tax for
2002. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court.
See Amarasinghe v. Comm’r. of Internal Revenue, Tax Ct. No. 06-
15883 (U.S.T.C. Nov. 9, 2007). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.