The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6602•Frederick Hamilton Banks v. Patricia R. Stansberry
07-6602Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 25, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6602
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
District Judge. (5:07-hc-02011-H)
Submitted: July 19, 2007 Decided: July 25, 2007
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick Hamilton Banks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Frederick Hamilton Banks, a federal prisoner, appeals
the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)
petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court, but we modify the dismissal to reflect that it is
without prejudice. Banks v. Stansberry, No. 5:07-hc-02011-H
(E.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.