The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6401•United States of America v. Elbert Thomas Knight
07-6401Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 16, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ELBERT THOMAS KNIGHT,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 07-6402
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ELBERT THOMAS KNIGHT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:96-cr-00196-HCM; 2:00-cr-00056-RAJ)
Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 16, 2007
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elbert Thomas Knight, Appellant Pro Se. James Ashford Metcalfe,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Elbert Thomas Knight
appeals the district court’s order denying reconsideration of his
motion seeking an order to compel the Government to file a motion
to reduce his sentence based on substantial assistance. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United
States v. Knight, Nos. 2:96-cr-00196-HCM; 2:00-cr-00056-RAJ (E.D.
Va. filed Feb. 27, 2007; entered Feb. 28, 2007). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.