The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6394•Eric Glascoe v. United States Parole Commission
07-6394Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 10, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6394
ERIC GLASCOE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION; THE DISTRICT
OF COLUMBIA,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07-cv-
00294-RWT)
Submitted: July 18, 2007 Decided: August 10, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Glascoe, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer A. Wright, Assistant
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Eric Glascoe appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice
for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Glascoe v. U.S. Parole
Comm’n, No. 8:07-cv-00294-RWT (D. Md. Feb. 22, 2007). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.