The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6361•Jessie C. Scott v. United States of America
07-6361Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 28, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6361
JESSIE C. SCOTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:06-
cv-02777-PJM)
Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 28, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jessie C. Scott, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr., Ariana
Wright Arnold, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Jessie C. Scott appeals the district court’s order
denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g) motion to return property. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Scott v. United States, No. 8:06-cv-02777-PJM (D. Md.
filed Feb. 23, 2007 & entered Feb. 26, 2007). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.