The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6314•Marjil Lee Bergara v. A. Benton Chafin
07-6314Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 6, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6314
MARJIL LEE BERGARA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
A. BENTON CHAFIN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, Chief District
Judge. (7:07-cv-00061-jpj)
Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 6, 2007
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marjil Lee Bergara, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Marjil Lee Bergara appeals the district court’s order
dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) his complaint filed
pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and
find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bergara
v. Chafin, No. 7:07-cv-00061-jpj (W.D. Va. Feb. 20, 2007). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.