The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6309•Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr v. Keith D. Ellis
07-6309Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 21, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6309
CHARLES ROBERT BAREFOOT, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KEITH D. ELLIS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
District Judge. (5:06-CT-03123-D)
Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: June 21, 2007
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order and judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)
complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the
record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
See Barefoot v. Ellis, No. 5:06-CT-03123-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 13,
2007). We deny Barefoot’s motion for appointment of CJA counsel.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.