The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6287•United States of America v. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. 1:90-cr-00139-AVB
07-6287Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 7, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6287
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BEKIR VURAL,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 07-6709
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BEKIR VURAL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (1:90-cr-00139-AVB)
Submitted: August 24, 2007 Decided: September 7, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bekir Vural, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg, United
States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Bekir Vural appeals the
district court’s orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motions.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the orders of the district court. See
United States v. Vural, No. 1:90-cr-00139-AVB (E.D. Va. filed
Jan. 31, 2007 & entered Feb. 2, 2007; filed & entered Apr. 26,
2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.