The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6249•Daniel Peterson v. Lieutenant Ms. James
07-6249Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 12, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6249
DANIEL PETERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LIEUTENANT MS. JAMES; SERGEANT MS. RICHARDSON,
at Nash Correctional Institution; CHARLES
HILL, at Nash Correctional Institution;
CAPTAIN TUCK, at Nash Correctional
Institution,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:05-ct-00501-BO)
Submitted: June 25, 2007 Decided: July 12, 2007
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Peterson, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Yvette Harper, Assistant
Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Peterson appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Peterson v.
James, No. 5:05-ct-00501-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 15, 2007). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.