The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6233•Paul Roberson v. TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden
07-6233Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 3, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6233
PAUL ROBERSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (7:06-cv-00414-sgw)
Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: May 3, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul Roberson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant
United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Paul Roberson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)
petition and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Roberson v. O’Brien,
No. 7:06-cv-00414-sgw (W.D. Va. Jan. 31, 2007; filed Feb. 5, 2007,
entered Feb. 6, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.