The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6163•In re: Leland Fortney
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6163
In Re: LELAND FORTNEY,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(2:05-268-RBH-RSC)
Submitted: May 7, 2007 Decided: June 14, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leland Fortney, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Leland Fortney petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging
the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court
directing the district court to act. Our review of the district
court’s docket reveals that the district court issued an order
adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendations.
Fortney v. Yancey, No. 2:05-cv-2168-RBH (D.S.C. Apr. 20, 2007).
Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided
Fortney’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.