The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6156•United States of America v. Felix Antonio Colon, a/k/a Felix Anthony Colon
07-6156Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 6, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6156
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
FELIX ANTONIO COLON, a/k/a Felix Anthony
Colon,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:01-cr-00021-RAJ)
Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 6, 2007
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Felix Antonio Colon, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg,
United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, Laura Marie Everhart,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Felix Antonio Colon appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to compel specific performance based upon the
Government’s purported breach of plea agreement. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Colon, No. 2:01-cr-00021-RAJ (E.D. Va. Dec. 14, 2006). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.