The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-4864•Riccardo Darnell Jones v. Sergeant D. Riggs
07-4864Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 20, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8093
RICCARDO DARNELL JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT D. RIGGS; ERIC DYE; SUPERINTENDENT KEITH WHITENER;
ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT HERNANDEZ,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-00092-GCM)
Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: December 2, 2008
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Riccardo Darnell Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Riccardo Darnell Jones appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the record and
find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v.
Riggs, No. 5:08-cv-00092-GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 13, 2008). We deny
Jones’ motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.