The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-4816•Mable A. Stewart v. HENRY M. PAULSON, JR., Secretary, Department of the Treasury
07-4816Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 25, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1386
MABLE A. STEWART,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HENRY M. PAULSON, JR., Secretary, Department of the Treasury,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge.
(8:07-cv-01981-PJM)
Submitted: August 29, 2008 Decided: September 15, 2008
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mable A. Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Samuel Gordon, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mable A. Stewart filed a complaint alleging that her
former employer discriminated against her on the basis of her
gender, race, and religion, in violation of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, as amended. The district court conducted a hearing and
granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court from the bench.
Stewart v. Paulson, No. 8:07-cv-01981-PJM (D. Md. Mar. 5, 2008).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.