United States of America v. Anthony Marcellus Baker

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6933
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTHONY MARCELLUS BAKER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:94-
cr-00361-PJM-l; 8:08-cv-01102-PJM-l)
Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 27, 2008
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Marcellus Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein,
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

*To the extent that Baker seeks to raise his claims by way of
a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, the district court properly noted
that he must first obtain authorization from this court pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000).
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Marcellus Baker appeals the district court’s
orders denying his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C.A.
§ 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Baker, Nos.
8:94-cr-00361-PJM-l; 8:08-cv-01102-PJM-l (D. Md. filed May 1, 2008
and entered May 2, 2008; May 9, 2008). * We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --