The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-4664•Martina E. Clark v. United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Housing Service
07-4664Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 28, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1087
MARTINA E. CLARK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL HOUSING SERVICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (3:06-cv-00457-MR-DCK)
Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: June 23, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Martina E. Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Ann Youngs, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Martina E. Clark appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her complaint in which she sought an injunction to stop
a state court foreclosure proceeding. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Clark v. United States Dep’t
of Agriculture, No. 3:06-cv-00457-MR-DCK (W.D.N.C. Oct. 22, 2007).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.