Ernest Doe v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, The Classification System

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6666
ERNEST DOE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, The Classification
System; JON OZMINT, Director, South Carolina Department of
Corrections,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (3:07-cv-04109-CMC)
Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 11, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ernest Doe, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Ernest Doe appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Doe v. South
Carolina Dep’t. of Corr., No. 3:07-cv-04109-CMC (D.S.C. filed Feb.
13, 2008; entered Feb. 14, 2008). Doe’s motions for appointment of
counsel and to amend the complaint are denied. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --