The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-4379•United States of America v. Kirby Patrick Braxton
07-4379Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 15, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6650
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KIRBY PATRICK BRAXTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (4:05-cr-00105-F-1)
Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 11, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kirby Patrick Braxton, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Stephen Aubrey West, Assistant United States Attorneys, Ethan
Ainsworth Ontjes, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Kirby Patrick Braxton appeals the district court’s order
denying his Motion to Modify Payment Schedule. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Braxton, No. 4:05-cr-00105-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.