Timothy R. Martin v. Scott & Stringfellow, Inc.

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1435
TIMOTHY R. MARTIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SCOTT & STRINGFELLOW, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:06-cv-00207-HEH)
Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: October 6, 2008
Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy R. Martin, Appellant Pro Se. David Edward Constine, III,
TROUTMAN & SANDERS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Timothy R. Martin appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to vacate the arbitration award granted to Scott
& Stringfellow, Inc. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Martin’s motion
to supplement his reply brief, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Martin v. Scott & Stringfellow, Inc., No.
3:06-cv-00207-HEH (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 13, entered Mar. 14, 2008).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --