Bonnie Cruickshank Wallace v. Mercantile County Bank, f/k/a County Banking

07-2144Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 8, 2009

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-2144
BONNIE CRUICKSHANK WALLACE; THE WALLACE FAMILY TRUST; HOLLY
HALL PUBLICATIONS, INCORPORATED,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
MERCANTILE COUNTY BANK, f/k/a County Banking and Trust
Company; RAYMOND HAMM, JR.; GEBHARDT & SMITH, LLP,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:06-cv-03345-CCB)
Submitted: December 18, 2008 Decided: January 8, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Melvin J. Sykes, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants.
Lawrence J. Gebhardt, GEBHARDT & SMITH, LLP, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Bonnie Cruickshank Wallace, the Wallace Family Trust,
and Holly Hall Publications, Inc. (“Appellants”), appeal the
district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the
Defendants on their claims alleging malicious use of process and
abuse of process. We have reviewed the record included on
appeal as well as the parties’ briefs and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Wallace v. Mercantile Cnty Bank, No. 1:06-cv-
03345-CCB (D. Md. August 31, 2007). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
addressed in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.