The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-2041•United States of America v. Everette Bryant Law
07-2041Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 25, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7049
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
EVERETTE BRYANT LAW,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:93-cr-00066-jlk-1)
Submitted: October 29, 2008 Decided: November 17, 2008
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Everette Bryant Law, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Urban Baer,
Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Everette Bryant Law appeals the district court’s
orders denying him a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.A.
§ 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008), and denying his motion
for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See United States v. Law, No. 7:93-cr-
00066-jlk-1 (W.D. Va. May 6, 2008; June 16, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.