The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1916•Sandra Lynn Von Loetzen Bennie v. GENERAL MOTORS, ESIS/GMM Central Claims
07-1916Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 10, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1916
SANDRA LYNN VON LOETZEN BENNIE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GENERAL MOTORS, ESIS/GMM Central Claims,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.
(8:06-cv-01182-DKC)
Submitted: September 24, 2008 Decided: October 10, 2008
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sandra Lynn von Loetzen Bennie, Appellant Pro Se. Edward J.
Longosz, II, Laura Stover, ECKERT, SEAMANS, CHERIN & MELLOTT,
Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sandra Lynn von Loetzen Bennie appeals the district
court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and
dismissing this products liability action. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. von Loetzen Bennie v.
General Motors Corp., No. 8:06-cv-01182-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 9, 2007).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.