The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1814•Jamey Lamont Wilkins v. Officer Gaddy, in his individual and official capacity
07-1814Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 10, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7187
JAMEY LAMONT WILKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER GADDY, in his individual and official capacity,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00299-GCM)
Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 29, 2008
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamey Lamont Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jamey Lamont Wilkins appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Wilkins v. Officer Gaddy, No. 3:08-cv-00299-GCM
(W.D.N.C. July 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.