The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1800•United States of America v. Stacy Lynn Arena
07-1800Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 14, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6904
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
STACY LYNN ARENA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (4:95-cr-00026-JAM-3)
Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 11, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stacy Lynn Arena, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg,
United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Stacy Lynn Arena appeals the district court’s order
denying her motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C.A.
§ 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Arena, No.
4:95-cr-00026-JAM-3 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 25, 2008 and entered
Apr. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.