Nafi Ndiaye v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General

07-1771Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 19, 2008

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1771
NAFI NDIAYE,
Petitioner,
v.
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: May 28, 2008 Decided: June 19, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICES OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville,
Maryland, for Petitioner. Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant
Attorney General, Michael P. Lindemann, Assistant Director, Ethan
B. Kanter, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Nafi Ndiaye, a native and citizen of Mauritania,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reopen and reconsider. We
have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the
Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Ndiaye’s motion. See
8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for
review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In Re: Ndiaye
(B.I.A. July 11, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.