The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1574•Zhenlu Zhang v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 4th Cir. 1993 . - 2 - PER CURIAM: Zhenlu Zhang…
07-1574Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 18, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1574
ZHENLU ZHANG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, (STC);
COMPUTER SCIENCE CORPORATION, (CSC); NATIONAL
OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION,
(NOAA); JC MILLER, Lawyer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.
(8:06-cv-03001-DKC)
Submitted: September 13, 2007 Decided: September 18, 2007
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Zhenlu Zhang, Appellant Pro Se. JC Miller, SAUL & EWING, LLP,
Washington, DC; Larry Robert Seegull, DLA PIPER US LLP, Baltimore,
Maryland; Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Jason
Daniel Medinger, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore,
Maryland; Anessa Abrams, SCHMELTZER, APTAKER & SHEPARD, PC,
Washington, DC, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
* To the extent Zhang seeks to raise additional claims in his
informal brief, these claims are not properly before this court.
See Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Zhenlu Zhang appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. * Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Zhang v. Science & Technology Corp.,
No. 8:06-cv-03001-DKC (D. Md. May 18, 2007). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.