The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1495•Thomas R. Storkamp v. PETE GEREN, Secretary, Department of the Army
07-1495Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 2, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1558
THOMAS R. STORKAMP,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PETE GEREN, Secretary, Department of the Army,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:05-cv-00523-F)
Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 23, 2008
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas R. Storkamp, Appellant Pro Se. George Edward Bell
Holding, United States Attorney, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas R. Storkamp appeals the district court’s orders
granting summary judgment on Storkamp’s action alleging
violations of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794(a)
(2000), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 2000e-2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Storkamp v. Geren, No. 5:05-cv-
00523-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 8 & Apr. 9, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.