The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1440•David J. Washington v. PAMELA T. ELLIOTT, State Farm
07-1440Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 27, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1440
DAVID J. WASHINGTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PAMELA T. ELLIOTT, State Farm; LEVON GRAVES;
MAGISTRATE COX; THOMAS A. RUSSO; DIANE SCOTT;
JAMES SALEEBY; SHERRY RHODES; J. J. ROBERTS,
Trooper; MICHAEL G. NETTLES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:07-cv-00619-RBH)
Submitted: July 24, 2007 Decided: July 27, 2007
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David J. Washington, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
David J. Washington appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Washington v.
Elliott, No. 4:07-cv-00619-RBH (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2007). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.