The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1308•Eugene W. Johnson v. United States of America
07-1308Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 5, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1308
EUGENE W. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District
Judge. (2:05-cv-00522-WDK)
Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 5, 2007
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene W. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Anita K. Henry, Assistant
United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Eugene W. Johnson appeals the district court order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting
the Government’s motion to dismiss Johnson’s civil action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the district court’s reasoning that Johnson did not
exhaust his administrative remedies under the Federal Tort Claims
Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2675(a) (2000). See Johnson v. United States,
No. 2:05-cv-00522-WDK (E.D. Va. Mar. 19, 2007). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.