The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1305•Michael Baumhaft v. STANLEY MCGUFFIN, Chapter 11 Trustee for the
07-1305Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 17, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-2177
MICHAEL BAUMHAFT,
Creditor - Appellant,
v.
STANLEY MCGUFFIN, Chapter 11 Trustee for the Debtor BHB
Enterprises LLC, d/b/a Tycoon’s Gallery of Games,
Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:06-cv-03617-RBH)
Submitted: May 28, 2008 Decided: July 8, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Weston Adams, III, Jillian M. Benson, Ashley B. Stratton, MCANGUS,
GOUDELOCK & COURIE, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant.
Tara E. Nauful, Lindsey C. Livingston, HAYNSWORTH, SINKLER, BOYD,
P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
PER CURIAM:
Michael Baumhaft appeals from the district court’s orders
affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting the trustee’s
motion to correct a scrivener’s error in the 1998 Judgment of the
bankruptcy court to conform to the contemporaneously-filed Order,
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a), Fed. R. Bankr. 9024, and denying
his motion for a rehearing. We have reviewed the record and the
briefs filed by the parties and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Baumhaft v. McGuffin, No. 4:06-cv-03617-RBH (D.S.C. Sept.
21 & Oct. 22, 2007). We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw from
the case. We also grant the Appellee’s motion to submit this case
on the briefs because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.