The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1301•Chester Lee McDowell, Sr v. Internal Revenue Service
07-1301Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 27, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1301
CHESTER LEE MCDOWELL, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; CHARLES BARRETT, IRS
Agent,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
District Judge. (2:06-cv-00022-FL)
Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 27, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chester Lee McDowell, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Joan Iris
Oppenheimer, Patricia McDonald Bowman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Chester Lee McDowell, Sr. appeals the district court’s
order granting defendants’ motions to dismiss and dismissing his
complaint for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim
upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See McDowell v. Internal Revenue
Service, No. 2:06-CV-00022-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2007). We also
deny the Government’s motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.