The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1257•Reginald E. Jarvis v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
07-1257Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 28, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1994
REGINALD E. JARVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:05-cv-02950-CCB)
Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: June 23, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip R. Kete, General Counsel, AFGE LOCAL 1923, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States
Attorney, Larry D. Adams, Assistant United States Attorney,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Reginald E. Jarvis appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s summary judgment motion on his race
discrimination claim, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17
(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Jarvis v. Astrue, No. 1:05-cv-02950-CCB (D. Md. July
31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.