The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1240•Alonzo Lemonte Conyers, Sr v. Department of the Army
07-1240Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 10, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1240
ALONZO LEMONTE CONYERS, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY; UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.
(1:06-cv-00231-JFM)
Submitted: September 26, 2007 Decided: October 10, 2007
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alonzo Lemonte Conyers, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alex Samuel Gordon, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Alonzo Lemonte Conyers, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing as a matter of law his Federal Tort Claims Act
action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Conyers v. Dep’t of the Army, No. 1:06-cv-00231-JFM (D. Md.
Jan. 12, 2007). We deny Conyers’s motion for appointment of
counsel, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.