The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1207•Kwaku O. Kushindana v. Neighborhood Stabilization Fund, Incorporated
07-1207Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 17, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1207
KWAKU O. KUSHINDANA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION FUND, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 07-1419
KWAKU O. KUSHINDANA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSISTANCE CORPORATION OF AMERICA
(NON-PROFIT),
Defendant - Appellee,
and
CITIMORTGAGE, INCORPORATED, (Missouri),
Defendant.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, J. Frederick Motz,
District Judges. (1:06-cv-01328-RDB; 1:06-cv-03057-JFM)
Submitted: July 23, 2007 Decided: August 17, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kwaku O. Kushindana, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas E. Fierberg, BODE &
GRENIER, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Kwaku O. Kushindana
appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaints
against the Neighborhood Stabilization Fund and the Neighborhood
Assistance Corporation of America without prejudice based on the
existence of arbitration agreements between the parties. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the district court.
Kushindana v. Neighborhood Stabilization Fund, Inc., No. 1:06-cv-
01328-RDB (D. Md. Feb. 28, 2007); Kushindana v. Neighborhood
Assistance Corp. of America, No. 1:06-cv-03057-FJM (D. Md. Apr. 4,
2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.