The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1186•Pamela Marshall v. Doctor Francis J. Harvey
07-1186Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 26, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1186
PAMELA MARSHALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOCTOR FRANCIS J. HARVEY; LTC WILLIAM LUKENS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (1:06-cv-01160-LMB)
Submitted: July 24, 2007 Decided: July 26, 2007
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pamela Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Larry Lee Gregg, Assistant
United States Attorney, Kevin Jason Mikolashek, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Pamela Marshall appeals the district court’s order
granting her former federal employer’s motion for summary judgment
as to her petition for review of the Merit System Protection
Board’s decision and on her employment discrimination claim. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Marshall v. Harvey, No. 1:06-cv-01160-LMB (E.D. Va. Feb. 9,
2007; filed Feb. 15, 2007 & entered Feb. 16, 2007). We deny
Marshall’s motion to expedite as moot and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.