The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1154•Tanya Jones v. Emc Mortgage Company, Incorporated
07-1154Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 24, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1154
TANYA JONES; DONNA JONES,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
EMC MORTGAGE COMPANY, INCORPORATED; MORTGAGE
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED;
ROSENBERG & ASSOCIATES, LLC; GREENPOINT
MORTGAGE FUNDING, INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.
(8:06-cv-03038)
Submitted: October 15, 2007 Decided: October 24, 2007
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tanya Jones, Donna Jones, Appellants Pro Se. David Samuel Panzer,
GREENBERG & TRAURIG, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Mark David Meyer,
ROSENBERG & ASSOCIATES, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland; Brian L. Moffet,
GORDON, FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN, HOFFBERGER & HOLLANDER, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Tanya and Donna Jones appeal the district court’s order
dismissing their civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Jones v. EMC Mortgage Co., Inc., No.
8:06-cv-03038 (D. Md. Feb. 5, 2007). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.