The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1071•Curtis Koran Lennon v. PETER D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General
07-1071Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 11, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1071
CURTIS KORAN LENNON,
Petitioner,
versus
PETER D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A95-473-964)
Submitted: September 26, 2007 Decided: October 11, 2007
Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nita Dobroshi, LAW OFFICES OF SPAR & BERNSTEIN, P.C., New York, New
York, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney
General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Carol
Federighi, Senior Litigation Counsel, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Koran Lennon, a native and citizen of Jamaica,
petitions for review of a final administrative order of removal
issued pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1228 (2000). We have carefully
reviewed the record and the administrative order and conclude that
Lennon has waived his right to file a petition for review of the
order. Accordingly, we grant the Attorney General’s motion to
dismiss Lennon’s petition for review. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.