The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1038•Carmansita Washington v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
07-1038Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 19, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1038
CARMANSITA WASHINGTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT
AUTHORITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:06-cv-00358-CMH-BR)
Submitted: June 4, 2007 Decided: June 19, 2007
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carmansita Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Fredric H. Schuster,
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Washington, D.C.,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Carmansita Washington appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant WMATA’s motion for summary judgment in
Washington’s personal injury action arising out of a slip and fall
incident. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Washington v. Washington Metro. Area Transit
Auth., No. 1:06-cv-00358-CMH-BR (E.D. Va. Dec. 12, 2006). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.