The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1022•071022.U
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1022
ROBERT F. STEEVES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ANDREW C. VON
ESCHENBACH, Acting Commissioner of Food and
Drugs,
Defendants - Appellees.
and
LESTER M. CRAWFORD, Commissioner of Food and
Drugs, United States Food and Drug
Administration; LESTER M. CRAWFORD,
individually and personally; NORRIS ALDERSON;
MARLENE HAFFNER; MURRAY LUMPKIN,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District
Judge. (3:05-cv-00043-NKM)
Submitted: June 22, 2007 Decided: July 12, 2007
Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Robert F. Steeves, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Bugbee Winn, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Robert F. Steeves appeals the district court’s order
granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss his civil complaint in
which he alleged numerous workplace violations by current and
former employees of the Food and Drug Administration. The district
court found it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Steeves’s
claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Steeves v. United States, No. 3:05-cv-00043 (W.D. Va.,
Dec. 6, 2006). We deny Steeves’s motion to strike the Appellees’
informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.