The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-8025•Harvey P. Short v. WILLIAM J. CHARNOCK, Prosecutor
06-8025Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 5, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-8025
HARVEY P. SHORT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM J. CHARNOCK, Prosecutor; SUE C.
RUBENSTEIN, Bar Admission Administrator;
ROBERT SCHULENBURG, Assistant Prosecutor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr.,
District Judge. (2:06-cv-00721)
Submitted: May 31, 2007 Decided: June 5, 2007
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harvey P. Short, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Harvey P. Short appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
without prejudice Short’s civil action. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Short v. Charnock, No.
2:06-cv-00721 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.