Michael John Brown v. City of Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 4th Cir. 1999

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7980
MICHAEL JOHN BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MAYOR OBENDORF, Mayor, Virginia Beach; TERRY
S. JENKENS, Director, Community Service Board;
ALFRED M. JACOCKS, Chief of Police, Virginia
Beach; BRUCE C. MARQUIES, Norfolk Police
Chief; NORFOLK FIRE RESCUE, Paramedic III;
NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; DIRECTOR
ADMINISTRATION, Norfolk General Hospital
Sentara; PAUL FRAIM, Mayor of Norfolk;
VIRGINIA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT; PAUL
LANTEIGNE, Sheriff of VBCC; MEDICAL
CONTRACTOR, VBCC; POLICE CHIEF, Virginia
Beach,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
Judge. (2:06-cv-00509-RBS)
Submitted: April 20, 2007 Decided: May 7, 2007
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Michael John Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

*Brown has failed to clearly address the district court’s
dismissal of any of his other claims; therefore, review of those
claims on appeal has been waived. See Edwards v. City of
Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999); 4th Cir. R.
34(b).
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Michael John Brown appeals from the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure
to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error, as Brown failed
to adequately allege that his injuries were the result of an
intentional exercise of force by police officers in violation of
the Fourth Amendment. * See Vathekan v. Prince George’s County, 154
F.3d 173, 178 (4th Cir. 1998). Therefore, we affirm the district
court’s ruling and deny Brown’s motion for appointment of counsel.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --