The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-7977•Herman Cefus Newman v. GENE M. JOHNSON, Director
06-7977Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 18, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7977
HERMAN CEFUS NEWMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director; FRED SCHILLING,
Medical Director; EDDIE PEARSON, Warden;
HUNTER JOHNSON, Major; MS. MASSENGBURG,
Grievance Coordinator,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (2:05-cv-00566-JBF)
Submitted: May 4, 2007 Decided: May 18, 2007
Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herman Cefus Newman, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Herman Cefus Newman appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Newman v.
Johnson, No. 2:05-cv-00566-JBF (E.D. Va. Nov. 6, 2006). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.