The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-7965•Eric L. Tolbert v. Echard; Nurse Craig; Nurse Snider
06-7965Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 2, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7965
ERIC L. TOLBERT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOCTOR LIGHTSEY; EARL V. ECHARD; NURSE CRAIG;
NURSE SNIDER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:05-ct-00428-BO)
Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: May 2, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric L. Tolbert, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth P. McCullough, YOUNG,
MOORE & HENDERSON, P.A., Raleigh, North Carolina; Elizabeth F.
Parsons, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Eric L. Tolbert appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny Tolbert’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Tolbert v. Lightsey, No.
5:05-ct-00428-BO (E.D.N.C. Sep. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.