The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-7917•Michael Anthony Epps v. North Carolina Department of Corrections
06-7917Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 16, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7917
MICHAEL ANTHONY EPPS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
DOCTOR STAMPLER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (5:06-ct-03076-D)
Submitted: March 21, 2007 Decided: May 16, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Anthony Epps, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Michael Anthony Epps appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Epps v. North Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No.
5:06-ct-03076-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 31, 2006). We deny Epps’ motion to
remand to file an amended complaint. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.