The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-7895•Janet Livingston v. DEBORAH A. HICKEY, Warden
06-7895Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 5, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7895
JANET LIVINGSTON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
DEBORAH A. HICKEY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Chief
District Judge. (1:05-cv-00015)
Submitted: May 31, 2007 Decided: June 5, 2007
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Janet Livingston, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Janet Livingston, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)
petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Livingston v. Hickey, No. 1:05-cv-00015 (S.D.W.
Va. Oct. 18, 2006). We deny Livingston’s motion for bail pending
appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.