The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-7860•United States of America v. Terry Deshawn Lyttle
06-7860Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 15, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7860
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TERRY DESHAWN LYTTLE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith,
District Judge. (4:01-cr-00044-RBS)
Submitted: January 31, 2007 Decided: February 15, 2007
Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terry Deshawn Lyttle, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke,
Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Terry Deshawn Lyttle appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R. Crim.
P. 35(b) motion or, in the alternative, for a reduction of his
sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. Lyttle, No. 4:01-cr-00044-RBS
(E.D. Va. Sept. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.